LWC and LWR are important tools in Salesforce development, but knowing when to use each can be tricky. Salesforce developers have two powerful tools: Lightning Web Components (LWC) and Lightning Web Runtime (LWR). While both are designed to help create lightning-fast web applications, they have different strengths and weaknesses. In this guide, we’ll explore the differences between LWC and LWR and help you decide which is right for your project.

Understanding the basics of LWC and LWR

Before diving into the differences between LWC and LWR, it’s important to understand the basics of each tool. Lightning Web Components (LWC) is a modern programming model for building web applications on the Salesforce platform. It uses standard web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to create reusable components that can be easily integrated into your Salesforce org. Lightning Web Runtime (LWR), on the other hand, is a lightweight runtime environment that allows you to run your web applications outside of the Salesforce platform. It’s designed for developers who want to build web applications that can be deployed to any platform, not just Salesforce.

When to use LWC

LWC is best used when you want to build reusable components that can be easily integrated into your Salesforce org. It’s a great choice for developers who want to create custom UI components that can be used across multiple applications. LWC is also a good choice if you want to take advantage of the latest web technologies and standards, as it uses HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Additionally, LWC is optimized for performance and can handle large amounts of data, making it a good choice for complex applications.

When to use LWR

LWR, or Lightning Web Runtime, is best used when you want to build standalone applications that can be deployed outside of Salesforce. It’s a great choice for developers who want to create custom applications that can be used on any platform, not just Salesforce. LWR uses the same technology stack as LWC, but it’s optimized for standalone applications rather than reusable components. Additionally, LWR allows for more flexibility in terms of deployment and hosting options, making it a good choice for developers who want more control over their applications.

Pros and cons of each approach

When it comes to choosing between LWC and LWR, there are pros and cons to each approach. LWC is great for building reusable components within Salesforce, which can save time and effort in the long run. However, it may not be the best choice if you need to build standalone applications that can be deployed outside of Salesforce. On the other hand, LWR is optimized for standalone applications and offers more flexibility in deployment and hosting options. However, it may require more effort to build and maintain than LWC. Ultimately, choosing between LWC and LWR depends on your specific development needs and goals.

Best practices for using LWC and LWR together

While LWC and LWR have their strengths and weaknesses, they can also be used together to create more complex and powerful applications. For example, you can use LWC to build reusable components that can be used within LWR applications, or you can use LWR to build standalone applications that interact with Salesforce data through LWC components. When using LWC and LWR together, it’s important to follow best practices such as keeping your code modular and well-organized, using version control to track changes, and testing your code thoroughly before deployment.

Are you looking for experienced LWC developers to enhance your organization? Please contact CloudVandana and Hire remote Salesforce LWC Developers on Demand. Call Now.